
(Update) The HP TouchPad is officially dead
In a sense, the iPad was released twice in the span of one month. First, the iPad wifi hit stores April 3rd, and seemed to be nothing short of a successful launch. 27 days later, on April 30th, the iPad 3G was released into the wild. Again, the lines formed around the Apple stores as fans awaited the launch of their highly-anticipated 3G-enabled iPad.
Many said the iPad was a stupid idea. Heck, some still do. After all, it can’t multi-task, it doesn’t have Flash and it doesn’t exactly do anything a laptop can’t do. Yet somehow, Apple’s latest gadget was able to see two successful launches. HP, who was destined to give the iPad a run for its money, can’t even manage one. But why?
There is no denying that the iPad had heavy press coverage even before it was confirmed as true. Apple was the big winner of CES 2010‚Ķand the company wasn’t even there. Yet all the media and tech blogs could talk about was Apple’s new magical device.
Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer even went on to show off Hewlet Packard’s upcoming slate during the pre-CES keynote. Whether it was in an attempt to beat Apple to the punch in popularizing slate computing, or mere coincidence, he made sure to show off the Windows 7 tablet at the show. it never came. Sometimes it’s common for a major company to spill big money into a product, demo the device and have it never see the light of day.
Last week it was reported that HP had canceled their tablet. According to some media outlets, HP was not satisfied with Windows 7 as a tablet OS.
On paper, When compared to the iPad, HP Slate should have provided a strong competitor for Apple’s device; it multi-tasks, runs flash, has a (when looking strictly an numbers) stronger processor, built-in webcam HDMI out, USB 2.0 port. Engadget tallied up their specs and found that pound-for-pound, the HP tablet may easily seem like the wiser purchase. Almost all of those advantages are things that Apple’s machine has been criticized for. It should have been a sure-fire winner among Windows users. It could be that the device was destined to run a standard version of Windows 7 rather than an optimized Windows 7 more suitable for mobile devices. The image below shows the specifications of each device next to each other:
(Image: Engadget)
It’s easy to play the spec game; load your product with features and narrow it down to the essentials to put in only what is needed for the time. However, this also opens up the difficult strategy of improving your product up in incremental releases and capturing the audience each time. A strategy Apple is very familiar with. There is a difference between taking a risk to make a breakthrough and just following through with what’s hot. HP took an easier route while Apple, as they like to do, decided to place added importance on the future of slate computing. So far, it seems to have paid off.
When creating a tablet computer, which amounts to what is essentially a laptop without a keyboard, its about holding a device upright in your hands. With standard laptops users have the luxury or setting it on a desk or just resting their hands on their computer while they wait for a page to load. A minute wait for a program to launch seems a lot longer when holding up the computer with your hands, as is the case with a tablet. When holding something in their hands, people naturally opt for total control. Chances are that Apple realized this early on as they struggled to create the iPhone. They likely had a good idea as to how far they would have to optimize their OS to run on a tablet. Which put Apple at a major advantage when designing the user interface.
Often when reducing the size of a device, battery life has to be sacrificed, because the battery is also becoming smaller. Run a full-fledged operating system like Windows seven on a tablet, complete with all the bells and whistles of a laptop. Battery performance is going to suffer. Chances are that HP saw this as a potential problem and knew that this was not the time to invest in a Windows slate. Combine that with the megaton load of media exposure Apple had before, during and after the iPad announcement and even running through it’s release it’s hard to see yourself in the top spot against them.
HP’s tablet wasn’t the only casualty of the iPad’s extensive media coverage and popularity. Microsoft canceled their Courier. The device was said to be a tablet PC (or two? Sort of?) hinged together at the side, almost like a book. Perhaps it wasn’t made with the same sort of drive that Apple products are always pushed with. It’s rumored that Jobs’ tough management techniques have made people cry. In a 2007 book entitled The No A–hole Rule, it was said that, “[Jobs] inspires astounding effort and creativity from his people,” and that a Silicon Valley insider told the author that he had seen Jobs verbally thrash several employees and make some of them cry, though this insider finished with saying that Jobs “was almost always right.” It brought out some of the best work in people, no doubt. However, it’s also important to remember that unlike Apple, Microsoft isn’t a hardware-focused company, but that’s what works for them.
What made the iPad so popular in the end, however, was it’s ease of use. It may seem hard to imagine, but to some older people, the computer mouse is a strange concept. It has nothing to do with their intelligence, they simply haven’t been exposed to it as much as we have. But a device that trims the user experience down to nothing more than pointing at where you want to go has already changed some lives. (That sounds like a stretch, but please watch the heartwarming video of a 100-year-old woman learning to use her first computer, an iPad.)
iSmashPhone even ran the iPad through the child test. Putting a 5-year-old on a computer for the first time didn’t exactly work out as easily as we imagined. However, the kid is very familiar with his Nintendo DS. For simplicity’s sake, upon presenting him with the iPad, we just told him it was a new computer for the house. The more hands-on pointing interface of the iPad worked. Now he says he likes the iPad better than his DS and cartoons. It’s fascinating to see how computing becomes totally different for him than it was for our generation.
The thing is, technology isn’t always about the fastest processor or how many USB ports you can cram into your device. Sometimes it’s about making for a satisfying experience without the hassle of too many plugs and adapters. Sometimes it’s about making at least one aspect of life a little bit easier.
In the end, it’s about the experience, not always what’s under the hood.
That said, we truly hope that HP has learned from their failed Slate project and can use their purchase of Palm to improve their approach. Even though we do have a love for our Apple products, we have even more of a love for the technology industry. The last thing we want to see if Apple shutting off the tablet space to the rest of the industry. Competition, after all, is the father of invention.






Accessories & Apps: Beta Testers Wanted
iOS Firmware/IPSW Download Guide
Legacy iTunes Download Archive
App Store Top Charts
We are working feverishly on a whole new batch of demo movies for an iPad competitor!
The Ipad did not kill the slate its current OS did. However, you apple homers will be crushed when the OS is solved and the Slate or another PC based table it released that will be a real computer and not a toy like the IPAD!
Thanks for a well written article, loved the video.
Apple has realized that heaps of people don’t want a computer, they just want to access ‘stuff’, like you do with a TV or a radio.
Sure, someone will bring out a tablet computer, but for a lot of people it will just bring on all the headaches of the computer they just chucked into the corner of their garage, because they got sick of calling in a geek to fix it so they could just watch web TV etc on it etc.
Apple lovers… Do you think the reason the Slate was killed had more to do with the acquisition of Palm than the abilities (or lack there os of Windows 7)? Just a thought. Probably part of the deal. Wouldn’t suprise me if HP realeased an iPad competitor buy the end of this year running Palm’s Web OS and they just won’t call it the Slate.
This. The original commenter needs to go back one more step: why did HP buy WebOS? They bought it because they didn’t think their slate would sell next to the iPad with their product running Windows 7. In addition, they’re seeing that having control of an OS is the only way to have full control of the phone experience.
I was one of the lucky few to get my hands on an iPhone last week and I must say, so far so good. It is an incredible piece of technology and I think it will change the way we read, watch movies, listen to music and more. I just want to find more apps and sites related to iPhone, which seem to be hard to trace online. I bought the iPhone at an online store listed on shopping index so it was delivered. The best thing about iPhone is going to be video and HTML5. Most of the video sites such as YouTube and vimeo can be accessed by the iPhone and I think it will improve the ultimate viewing experience.
@John, PC lover
I think the HP tablet died because of this:
It’s an Atom-based Tablet with a 2 cell battery. Holy hell what a bad idea.
Atom + 2 cell = >2 hours per cell of battery life? There isn’t a Netbook on the market that can manage that. Most Atom Netbooks with 3 cells can barely manage 1 hour per cell.
The HP design was a horrible idea. They basically tried to pack all the amenities of a Rolls into a VW Bug.
“Those who would trade in their freedom for their protection deserve neither” – Benjamin Franklin
Apple is taking away freedom from the people who work so hard to create software for their platform, Apple is taking away choices from their users in thinly veiled manipulation to gain profit, Apple claims to do these things in the name of security, safety, a better experience…
It is a sad state of affairs when such a company is seen as a success.
I’m sorry but how will a slate with some form of WebOS offer any greater functionality than the current iPad? I understand that running win7 would devour battery life but I still dream of a time when I’m able to use whatever programs I wish (such as photoshop on the go) and surf the web the way I want to.
when will you people learn? its not about the hardware or who’s evil. its about delivering a usable product. if microsoft are able to deliver an intuitive user interface as iphone’s OS, its the benefits to the consumers as they have more choices. time will come when microsoft and android are able to catch up to apple’s user interface. but even when that actually happens, there are still millions of people going to buy the next iphone or ipads.
ipad is meant for ease of use and mobility. its was NEVER meant to replace a ‘computer’. there are netbook and laptop for anybody who wants the ‘other’ features.
apple have good reasons to refuse flash, usb ports, hdmi, etc on their ipads. or even on their iphones. no multi tasking? no problem. millions of people are still buying them even if they know the devices dont have all these features. why? because they dont care! most people dont use them anyway. they just want something easy they can use!
“The thing is, technology isn’t always about the fastest processor or how many USB ports you can cram into your device. Sometimes it’s about making for a satisfying experience without the hassle of too many plugs and adapters. Sometimes it’s about making at least one aspect of life a little bit easier.”
This. The thing is that you can’t tell that to techno-nerds. They seem to be under some kind of illusion that any new bit of kit should be designed for their needs. As has been proven with many news stories the ipad is designed for everyone else and, so it appears, very successfully.
This article fails to see the whole point of the i-pad
It is NOT ‘basically a laptop with no keyboard’
It is a new kind of device. Steve Jobs looked at what people
actually use computers for, ( and by people I mean ALL people not
just tech-savvy people ) and he saw that there is a vast market
and user base for people who are willing to learn about the same
amount as they will learn to use a phone BUT NO MORE
The i-pad is a device that is defined as much by what it DOES NOT DO
as much as what it does do. In this case, with the object being to
reach a vast number of people who currently do not use computers unless
they absolutely have to the i-pad is a classic example of LESS IS MORE.
Some people will actually avoid a device that has too many features.
They will not avoid the i-pad.
LEAVING OUT THE USB HAS GREATLY INCREASED THE USER BASE
This is something that a techie simply can not understand
and it is why Steve Jobs is a genius.
Nice article. But please, please fix your English grammar and usage before publishing.
“LEAVING OUT THE USB HAS GREATLY INCREASED THE USER BASE
This is something that a techie simply can not understand
” Source?
Garunteed when one is included (or camera or “multi-tasking”) in a future version (as a thinly veiled way of bilking more money out of you), you’ll be singing a different tune.
For those wishing to understand the runaway success of the iPad you should read up on the concept of Satisficing first proposed in the 50s by Herbert Simon who developed BONDED RATIONALITY
Wikipedia:
You should really try reading the news. The HP Slate has just been announced with WebOS instead of Windows 7. I will almost always buy the least confining option and Apple, once again, is selling something that locks down the options and leaves me in a bad place if I decide I want more funtionality, upgradable on my timing.
Wow, you really got to play with an iPhone last week. You are lucky that you got your hands on it. I hear they are really hard to come by since they are so new….
I bet someday we’ll see hundreds of iPhones all over the place and they won’t be as rare as they are now.
HP didn’t just announce a new slate with WebOS. But it’s all but confirmed that their original plan for the HP Slate to run Windows 7 has been killed. Current speculation is that it will most likely run WebOS if it ever gets released.
What HP didn’t realize until they saw the success of the iPad is that it’s not about having more functionality or whether something is upgradeable.
Hold your breath Derek. It will be good to see you turn colors and pass out.
“during and after the iPad announcement and even running through it’s release…”
“What made the iPad so popular in the end, however, was it’s ease of use.”
Actually, it’s “its release” and “its ease of use.”
If you can’t get something so simple correct, why should I trust your article?
Apple taking choices from their users? Well the users have a choice to not buy Apple product but they do buy it for whatever reason, maybe the simplicity, ease of use, the trends etc. I am sorry if their choice of buying iPads which is totally out of their free will could any way affect or annoy you in some way that I do not know.
Plus for general population, iPad is the only slate device out there that they ever heard of. I know most of the tech enthusiasts ‘choose’ to wait which is hilarious to me because it is really sad to see so called geek can get overworked by the rendered demo and basically a vaporware.
your right, but for the people who will have the oppurtunity to see other tablets offer things that dont require you to spend an additional $200 because it could have been bult into your tablet all at once then you wont here so many complaints about Apples lack openness. Ease of use is one thing, but there are consumers who would prefer having options.
It also’s used to rape the consumer’s pockets.
I also feel the reason HP killed the slate was due to the fact that they want to release a product that will be user friendly, so aquiring Palm for the use of their WEB OS and their Patents was a smart and strategic move. Palms OS is actually a really nice OS on the cell phone, this will give HP the oppurtunity to make sure the UI is correct for the consumer when they use the tablet which in turn will give other consumers other options aside from just buying an ipad that has no flash and requires you to buy apps and third party accessories in order to really get the proper use out of it.
Still waiting on that iPhone killer… its been 3 years now. Where is it?
Probably both. You make a good point though. In part they can’t compete with apple software wise. with palm they can.
In Australia we have a HP slate style tablet computer that has entered the market in the last few weeks.
It’s called the TEGA Tablet. I have used it and found it fantastic in many ways. The handwriting recognition built into Windows 7 is just amazing.
The TEGA Tablet has everything you need like 3 USB port, built in HSDPA Modem, camera, removable battery etc
I have wriiten a small post about my thoughts on it from an Apple fanboy perspective.
By the time the Slate with WebOS is released Flash will be mortally wounded and the iPad will have multitasking with iPhone OS 4.0. The only advantage will be a supposedly open environment, if HP decides to allow it. Thing is a lot of people don’t want open, they want fast and easy, and are willing to spend more money to get it.
The ipad looks pretty good, I’ll need to get used to no flash though.
I think HP still has something up their sleeve. Mostly just dropping Windows 7. It’s because Windows wasn’t ever designed to be touch oriented – which makes the iphone OS work so well. Maybe with an OS made for the use of touch and a device with similar specs, HP will have a pretty good product.
snarky, Ryan.
I’m guessing he’s in a part of the world without direct sales of iPhones and finally got his hands on one.
Looking back, I’m still wondering how the h3ll Pres. Medvedev got an iPhone 3G when it wasn’t on sale in Russia or anywhere close, and yet I couldn’t get one out of any of the Apple stores (3 of them) for 2 weeks.
You a troll, Hanks? I shouldn’t feed you, but sometimes I can’t resist giving bums on the street a few coins, either.
I’ll trump your Ben Franklin with a George Orwell. Ever read his *Politics and the English Language*, or *1984* – ?
He touched on those who use nominalizations (though that’s not the term he used) — nebulous concepts and emotion-ladened big words (like “freedom”) and act like they’ve said something concrete and profound.
They haven’t. Their thinking and use of terms is sloppy — purposely so, because their aim is political and propagandistic — to manipulate. Like you’ve done here.
Let’s be clear: none of those developers are in jail. None of them are prevented from getting up in the morning and going wherever they want, or doing whatever they want. They can develop an app for the app store (play by the rules), or Android or Windows Phone 7, or not. It’s their choice. They’re free to goof off or be productive however they want. Within reason (like obeying traffic laws, for example.)
Apple has never denied it is in business to make a profit. No deception there. Nothing is thinly veiled.
And you can take them at their word that security, safety and a better user experience. How do we know? They’ve delivered on it, and their competitors haven’t.
I’m not the first to note — so called “free” systems often means you spend more time futzing with the system and your hardware than doing anything constructive, while the “closed” Mac gives users something they spend the majority of their time using (not fixing and futzing with).
Which Tea Party local have you joined, BTW?
It’s always the same thing with Apple, release a device they could make a bucket load more money on but they decide to lock it down and dictate who can and can’t use it.
So what did WebOS have that Win 7 didn’t? An integrated app store, yes. Long battery life, yes. Apps built from the ground up designed for touch, yes. Why were those suddently important to have in a tablet after 8 years of putting the same old desktop version of Windows on tablets — what changed? The iPad released, that’s what. The iPad killed the Win 7 HP Slate. Now try arguing otherwise.
(sigh)
It’s GOOD, to be an APPLE user/shareholder!
A successful handheld computer is not going to be built by combining Windows 7 with notebook computer design techniques. There may be common pieces of technology, but it needs to be designed from the ground up.
imho, the most important technical issues for a handheld computer are long battery life and low heat generation. They’re related, in that low-power technology expertise is the key to dealing with these two issues.
Apple, to their credit got it right. The iPad battery lifetime spec is 2x that of the HP Slate… and it appears that, by making the iPad a battery with a computer (instead of the other way around), it actually meets or exceeds the spec.
HP, on the other hand, has a history of building notebooks that die prematurely because they generate and trap too much heat. That causes the battery to degrade, CPUs to die (due to accelerated electromigration), and a host of other problems. I doubt very much whether their 5 hour battery life spec would be met.
If all users want out of a slate device is e-mail, Internet browsing, listening to music, watching videos, and playing a few simple games, a full-featured OS like Windows 7 is a terrible anchor to weigh down such a device. A less resource-demanding OS, say a device-optimized Linux, could be the salvation for slate-like devices at HP, assuming of course that they’re designed with better heat dissipation characteristics and low-power design than their notebooks.
The danger is that we yet again get a monopoly in the tech world, and we become reliant on one companys product
There is no “Iphone” Killer. We all know that. God, I even hate the name “Something Killer”. it’s stupid. However, there are phones out there which beat the Iphone. Take the HTC Droid incredible for example. Apple just shows it’s enourmes marketing power, which is quite impressive. And also shows how stupid many peoples are…
There are a few things to look at here:
(1) HP (in my opinion) will still come out with the SLATE running Windows 7. Up until 3 weeks ago they were still coming out with reports and updates about the SLATE. They have lots of money and time invested in the SLATE and probably will try to recoup some of that.
(2) There is rumor that HP is also making a smaller version (6 inch) of the SLATE nick named the HALF-PINT. This is rumored to be running Android OS. It’s possible that it could be swapped to run WebOS.
(3) We have the rumor of the HP HURRICANE to be released in Q3. This is rumored to be running WebOS instead of the Windows 7.
I think that HP will decide to do all 3. The reasons being are that they have lots of money and time invested in the SLATE and they realize they need something on the market as soon as possible. This will help them recoup some of the money invested. It will also help bring in some of the people out there who want a FULL OPPERATING SYSTEM and not a phone based OS.
They probably see a need to bring a smaller more portable version to the market (but not to be mistaken for a phone…. hence the HP HALF-PINT). If this is running WebOS, this will be two fold. (1) it will bring a phone operating system to market for HP and more importantly (2) this will give WebOS a few months to have the APPs developed before the HP HURRICANE is released onto the market.
At that time HP will have a full version, fully integrated SLATE type device on market that will be able to compete with the iPad for market share.
As of now, iPad is ahead of the game with the iPhone OS only in the APPs department. HP needs some time to develop and test the HURRICANE. HP also needs to get something on the market as soon as possible at the same time trying to recoup some of the money that was invested in the SLATE.
This is why I think that HP will do all three.
HP SLATE
HP HALF-PINT
HP HURRICANE
I am the happy owner of the Apple iPad and although i paid almost twice the retail amount i have no regrets. The past month has been really fun with this device (a little costly on the apps end i must admit).
All i can really say is that i had tested many other types of tablets but simply knew that the Apple engineers had slam-dunked the iPad. Way-to go guys!
There are people out there too stupid to know how to use a mouse? REALLY? They can’t even be TAUGHT how to use a mouse? How effing hard is it to point and click? Is that REALLY such a hard concept to grasp?
Those people should be sterilized. Any relatives sharing even a remote part of their DNA should be sterilized. We MUST protect the future of humanity from such clueless morons.
Could you possibly be a bigger imbecile? Tablets have nothing to do with not being able to use a mouse, you useless retard.
unless you put not optimized for tablet operating system on it. it any case it does not matter, slate is dead so as web os touch pad ( shame)
If just for the capacity to handle flash, I’d buy a Slate right now. Immediately. HP ARE YOU LISTENING?
I JUST LAUGH AT APPLE CUSTOMERS REAL HARD. Apple is getting rich they are getting poor. Keep paying twice or 3 times what the product is worth. 700 to 800 dollars for a bigger version of ipod? yey you! Enjoy!
It goes to show again by mac users are Lemmings sold on looks and mktg.
Piper Jobs blowing his pipe again LOL